<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://the-classic-liberal.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://the-classic-liberal.com</link>
	<description>Old Right Libertarian &#38; Conservative Politics, Economics, and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:17:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Simple Questions for the People</title>
		<link>http://the-classic-liberal.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Simple Questions for the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-classic-liberal.com/?page_id=8#comment-311</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Note: I understand many of you have had trouble signing-up and/or signing-in to comment.  You should be able to now.  If you&#039;re still having difficulties, PLEASE send me an email! [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Note: I understand many of you have had trouble signing-up and/or signing-in to comment.  You should be able to now.  If you're still having difficulties, PLEASE send me an email! [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donh</title>
		<link>http://the-classic-liberal.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>donh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://the-classic-liberal.com/?page_id=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>LIBERAL, and CLASSIC LIBERAL. &quot;The Road to Serfdom, 1944, Frederich A. Hayek.

Hayek&#039;s forward to the 1952 printing by The University of Chicago Press,
which was also dedicated to &quot;THE SOCIALISTS OF ALL PARTIES.&quot;

Hayek wrote: &quot;The fact that this book was originally written with only the
British public in mind does not appear to have seriously affected its intelligibility
for the American reader. But there is one point of phraseology which I ought to
explain here to forestall any misunderstanding. I use throughout the term &quot;liberal&quot;
in the normal nineteenth century sense in which it is still current in Britain.
In current American usage it often means very nearly the opposite of this. It has
been part of the camouflage of leftish movements in this country, helped by the
muddleheadedness of many who really believe in liberty, that &quot;liberal&quot; has come
to mean the advocacy of almost every kind of government control. I am still
puzzled by those in the United States who truly believe in liberty should not only
have allowed the left to appropriate this almost indispensable term but should
even have assisted by beginning to use it themselves as a term of opprobrium.
This seems to be particularly regrettable because of the consequent tendency of many
true liberals to describe themselves as conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIBERAL, and CLASSIC LIBERAL. "The Road to Serfdom, 1944, Frederich A. Hayek.</p>
<p>Hayek's forward to the 1952 printing by The University of Chicago Press,<br />
which was also dedicated to "THE SOCIALISTS OF ALL PARTIES."</p>
<p>Hayek wrote: "The fact that this book was originally written with only the<br />
British public in mind does not appear to have seriously affected its intelligibility<br />
for the American reader. But there is one point of phraseology which I ought to<br />
explain here to forestall any misunderstanding. I use throughout the term "liberal"<br />
in the normal nineteenth century sense in which it is still current in Britain.<br />
In current American usage it often means very nearly the opposite of this. It has<br />
been part of the camouflage of leftish movements in this country, helped by the<br />
muddleheadedness of many who really believe in liberty, that "liberal" has come<br />
to mean the advocacy of almost every kind of government control. I am still<br />
puzzled by those in the United States who truly believe in liberty should not only<br />
have allowed the left to appropriate this almost indispensable term but should<br />
even have assisted by beginning to use it themselves as a term of opprobrium.<br />
This seems to be particularly regrettable because of the consequent tendency of many<br />
true liberals to describe themselves as conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.254 seconds using disk

Served from: the-classic-liberal.com @ 2012-02-08 12:20:34 -->
