evangeline-lillyIt's RULE 5 SATURDAY!

For this week's edition, we take a closer look at the income tax, and a closer look at the very pretty girl ... Evangeline Lilly too!

"How to Get a Million Hits on Your Blog in Less Than a Year!"

Nicole Evangeline Lilly (32-23-35) is a Canadian actress who got her big break when she was cast in the hit TV show Lost in 2004.

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup
Rule Five Sunday: Kate Beckinsale
Saturday Night is Bath Night.....

As a good Christian who set her sites on making the world a better place, she served as a foreign minister and lived in a grass hut in the Philippines when she was only 18. But her humanitarian work was not paying the bills, so when a talent agent approached her to do some modeling work she reluctantly accepted.

evangeline-lilly-in-whiteHer modeling work led to small parts in forgettable movies like Freddy Vs. Jason (2003), TV shows like Smallville (2001), and the movie Lizzie McGuire with Hilary Duff.

Calling Then Raising Obi's Sister's Rule 5 Post
The TCOTS Rule 5 Compliance Committee
"I Am Sith Lord Darth Hottiness"

Since then, she has become one of many Canadians to be embraced by the American public. And for good reason, not only does she have a killer body, but she's also a sweet, good natured girl.

The Income Tax Really Is Evil!

Hey ... It wouldn't be The Classic Liberal Blog if it didn't challenge conventional wisdom on a regular basis.

[The following was published as the foreword to Frank Chodorov's The Income Tax: Root of all Evil (1954)]

This was, to be sure, "the home of the free and the land of the brave." Americans were free simply because the government was too weak to intervene in the private affairs of the people — it did not have the money to do so — and they were brave because a free people is always venturesome. The obligation of freedom is a willingness to stand on your own feet.

evangeline-lilly-income-taxThe early American wanted it that way. He was wary of government, especially one that was out of his reach. He had just rid himself of a faraway and self-sufficient political establishment and he was not going to tolerate anything like it in his newly founded country. He recognized the need of some sort of government, to keep order, to protect him in the exercise of his rights, and to look after his interests in foreign lands. But he wanted it understood that the powers of that government would be clearly defined and be limited; it could not go beyond specified limits. It was in recognition of this fear of centralized power that the Founding Fathers put into the Constitution — it never would have been ratified without them — very specific restraints on the federal government.

Evangeline-Lilly-2In other matters, the early American was willing to put his faith in home government, in a government of neighbors, in a government that one could keep one's eyes on and, if necessary, lay one's hands on. For that reason, the United States was founded as a Union of separate and autonomous commonwealths. The states could go in for any political experiments the folks might want to try out — even socialism, for that matter — but the federal government had no such leeway. After all, there were other states nearby, and if a citizen did not like the way one state government was managing its affairs, he could move across the border; that threat of competition would keep each state from going too far in making changes or in intervening in the lives of the citizens.

The Constitution, then, kept the federal government off balance and weak. And a weak government is the corollary of a strong people.

evangeline-lilly-golden-globesThe Sixteenth Amendment changed all that. In the first place, by enabling the federal government to put its hands into the pockets and pay envelopes of the people, it drew their allegiance away from their local governments. It made them citizens of the United States rather than of their respective states. Theft loyalty followed theft money, which was now taken from them not by their local representatives, over whom they had some control, but by the representatives of the other forty-seven states. They became subject to the will of the central government, and their state of subjection was emphasized by every increase in the income tax levies.

Dari Alexander presents Talk Like a Pirate Day
Kim Kardashian, Megan Fox, Jessica Simpson, Eliza Dushku. Here she is, the Boob Czar!

The state governments likewise lost more and more of their autonomy. Not only was their source of revenue being dried up by federal preemption, so that they had less and less for the social services a government should provide, but they were compelled in their extremity to apply to the central authorities for help. In so doing they necessarily gave up some of their independence. They found it difficult to stand up to the institution from which they had to beg grants-in-aid. Furthermore, the federal government was in position to demand subservience from the state governments as a condition for subventions. evangeline-lilly-blackIt has now become politically wise for governors, legislators, and congressmen to "play ball" with the central government; they have been reduced to being procurement officers for the citizens who elect them. The economic power which the federal government secured by the Sixteenth Amendment enabled it to bribe the state governments, as well as the citizens, into submission to its will.

Around the Moronosphere
A hundred thousand hits!
Apropos of nothing

In that way, the whole spirit of the Union and of its Constitution has been liquidated. Income taxation has made of the United States as completely centralized a nation as any that went before it; the very kind of establishment the Founding Fathers abhorred was set up by this simple change in the tax laws. This is no longer the "home of the free," and what bravery remains is traceable to a tradition that is fast losing ground.

evangeline-lilly-bikiniFor those of us who still believe that freedom is best, the way is clear: we must concentrate on the correction of the mistake of 1913. The Sixteenth Amendment must be repealed. Nothing less will do. For it is only because it has this enormous revenue that the federal government is able to institute procedures that violate the individual's right to himself and his property; enforcement agencies must be paid. With the repeal of the amendment, the socialistic measures visited upon us these past thirty years will vanish.

Weed Card: New Garfunkel And Oates Song!
On board the Tucson Tea Party Bus
Patrick Swayze: 1952 - 2009
OH GOODY!

The purchase of elections with federal money will no longer be possible. And the power and dignity of the home governments will be restored.

This measure should be supported by the governors and legislators of all the states. Every state in the Union now contributes in income taxes to the federal government more than it gets back in grants-in-aid; this is inevitable, because the cost of maintaining the huge federal machinery must come out of the taxes before the citizen can get anything. With the abolition of income taxation the states will be better able to serve its citizens, and because the state governments are closer and more responsive to the will of the people, there is greater chance that the citizens will get their full dollar's worth in services.

Glorious Patriotic Hotties On The Beach!
The Ann-Margret Edition
Famke Janssen vs. Gemma Atkinson

However, the principal argument for the repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment is that only in that way can freedom from an interventionist government be restored to the American people.

evangeline-lilly-beach

Frank Chodorov (1887–1966) was an American thinker and member of the anti-New Deal Old Right. In 1944, Chodorov established the four-page monthly newsletter Analysis, described as "an individualistic publication—the only one of its kind in America." Attracting a modest subscriber base, the magazine merged with the conservative weekly Human Events in 1951.

In 1953, Chodorov founded the Intercollegiate Society of Individualists (ISI) with William F. Buckley, Jr. as president, becoming the first national conservative student organization, reaching 50,000 members by the end of the century. In later years, ISI became extremely influential as a clearinghouse of conservative publications and as a locus of the conservative intellectual movement in America.

UCLA cheerleaders
Abercrombie and Fitch
Chick Band Fans -- Get Crazy with Nada!
The Other McCain Exposes Alarming Conflict Within the Conservative Movement!

evangeline-lilly-hot

You got yr. Cherry Valance
Tarzan and Jane Skinnydipping Scene!
Rita Hayworth
MAE WEST...
Weekend Whip!
What is 'Rule 5 Sunday'?

What say you?
  • Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup » Pirate's Cove September 20, 2009 at 10:36 am

    [...] Taste Of Fall Linkfest & Glorious Patriotic Hotties On The Beach! at Nation Of Cowards, and Evangeline Lilly vs. the Evil Mistake of 1913 at The Classic Liberal. Anyone else have a link or hotty fest going on? Let me know so I can [...]

  • [...] only 2.9 percent of all daily passenger trips were on transit in the last year measured … Evangeline Lilly vs. the Evil Mistake of 1913 – the-classic-liberal.com 09/19/2009 It’s RULE 5 SATURDAY! For this week’s [...]

  • Drew September 21, 2009 at 6:58 pm

    Ya, hey dare!!!!!!

    I LOVE hockey!!!

  • Bob Belvedere September 21, 2009 at 7:17 pm

    Thanks for the linky love.

    Linked to at:
    The TCOTS RULE 5 SATURDAY

  • What’s Up in Michigan? September 25, 2009 at 10:15 pm

    [...] OK. I'll take that bet and raise you with ... Elimination of the Evil Income Tax! [...]

  • FMJRA Saturday #5 « A Conservative Shemale September 26, 2009 at 11:02 am

    [...] Craig, Denise and Jordana Brewster, but that’s OK because I got linked on rule 5 Sunday by The Classic Liberal. Honesty in Motion, in the blogroll now BTW as is Dustbury, linked to the rant about the [...]