Look, as far as I'm concerned, 9/11 "truthers" simply don't have the facts on their side. That's it.
Keynesians don't have the facts on their side either, but do we shun them, demean them, and call them crazy? After all, the evidence against Keynesianism is far more voluminousness than the evidence against truthers.
We should (and I do) ... Because straight-up! Keynesians are far more dangerous to mankind, than a 9/11 "truther" could ever dream of being!
The comments are open. Please, someone explain to me why the intentions of 9/11 "truthers" are wrong? When did it become an unspeakable sin in America (of all places), to consider the government a dangerous threat?
C'mon people! Get a grip! Truthers are harmless. Find a real enemy!
If unearned faith, yes faith, in government has become the litmus test for public discourse ... we're all doomed ... We might as well raise the white flag and surrender our lives to progressivism this afternoon.
What's happened to conservatism? We punish the skeptical while praising "tax credits" and other such Keynesian nonsense?
At best, it's philosophical schizophrenia. At worst, it's progressive State worship.
Think back to Van Jones ... Nobody gave a rat's behind that he was a communist. But a 9/11 truther? Gasp! The self-righteous alarms rang across the land!
Because progressivism is um, like, so respectable. Skepticism of the State however, is, well, just stoopid.
UPDATE:
The Republican Smear Machine
Rick “Gardasil” Perry is scared. Ninety minutes after Glenn Beck lied Debra Medina onto his show, through a neocon producer, Perry robocalls went out using the Beck clip. Surely the whole Beckian business was coordinated by the Rovians running the Perry campaign.
