Planned Parenthood

theCL  2010-02-10  History, Progressive

H/T - Conservative Hideout 2.0!

Frankly I had thought that at that time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. - Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, July 2, 2009.

How Planned Parenthood Duped America

Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise ... These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive.

Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government. Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as "gospel"; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America's family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justiices all accept as "social orthodoxy."

Sanger's obsession with eugenics can be traced back to her own family. One of 11 children, she wrote in the autobiographical book, My Fight for Birth Control, that "I associated poverty, toil, unemployment, drunkenness, cruelty, quarreling, fighting, debts, jails with large families." Just as important was the impression in her childhood of an inferior family status, exacerbated by the iconoclastic, "free-thinking" views of her father, whose "anti-Catholic attitudes did not make for his popularity" in a predominantly Irish community.

The fact that the wealthy families in her hometown of Corning, N.Y., had relatively few children, Sanger took as prima facie evidence of the impoverishing effect of larger families. The personal impact of this belief was heightened 1899, at the age of 48. Sanger was convinced that the "ordeals of motherhood" had caused the death of her mother.

Sanger advocacy of sex education reflected her interest in population control and birth prevention among the "unfit." Her first handbook, published for adolescents in 1915 and entitled, What Every Boy and Girl Should Know, featured a jarring afterword:

It is a vicious cycle; ignorance breeds poverty and poverty breeds ignorance. There is only one cure for both, and that is to stoop breeding these things. Stop bringing to birth children whose inheritance cannot be one of health or intelligence. Stop bringing into the world children whose parents cannot provide for them.

Her standard speech asserted seven conditions of life that "mandated" the use of birth control: the third was "when parents, though normal, had subnormal children"; the fourth, "when husband and wife were adolescent"; the fifth, "when the earning capacity of the father was inadequate." No right existed to exercise sex knowledge to advance procreation. Sanger described the fact that "anyone, no matter how ignorant, how diseased mentally or physically, how lacking in all knowledge of children, seemed to consider he or she had the right to become a parent."
Source: BlackGenocide.org

And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool. - The Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, p. 60.

Partial-Birth Abortion (WARNING: Graphic, Disturbing)

Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. - Margaret Sanger, Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

War Against the Weak

In the first three decades of the 20th Century, American corporate philanthropy combined with prestigious academic fraud to create the pseudoscience eugenics that institutionalized race politics as national policy. The goal: create a superior, white, Nordic race and obliterate the viability of everyone else.

How? By identifying so-called "defective" family trees and subjecting them to legislated segregation and sterilization programs. The victims: poor people, brown-haired white people, African Americans, immigrants, Indians, Eastern European Jews, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the superior genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists. The main culprits were the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune, in league with America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Harvard, Yale and Princeton, operating out of a complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. The eugenic network worked in tandem with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the State Department and numerous state governmental bodies and legislatures throughout the country, and even the U.S. Supreme Court. They were all bent on breeding a eugenically superior race, just as agronomists would breed better strains of corn. The plan was to wipe away the reproductive capability of the weak and inferior.

Ultimately, 60,000 Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America's most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger and Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Source: War Against the Weak

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." - Margaret Sanger, The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1.

Galton’s eccentric, sceptical, observing, flashing, cavalry-leader type of mind led him eventually to become the founder of the most important, significant and, I would add, genuine branch of sociology which exists, namely eugenics. - John Maynard Keynes, Eugenics Review, 1946.

The Tuskegee Experiment

[I]mpregnation will be regarded in an entirely different manner, more in the light of a surgical operation, so that it will be thought not ladylike to have it performed in the natural manner. - Bertrand Russell, The Scientific Outlook, 1972.

Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable. - Sir Julian Huxley, UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.

Comments
  • Regina February 26, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    So are you suggesting that no one, regardless of color or economic status should get an abortion? The Eugenics movement was indeed and will continue to be a terrible thing and most people in 2010 would not agree with it’s principles. The woman’s right to choose should be intertwined with contraception or else the population is unable to be controlled or a better word maybe be that the population would suffer as a whole if everyone chooses life. The idea that our world could become overpopulated is scarier than the Eugenics movement because it would lead to ruthless dictators called for genocide and mass suicides. So what is the solution in your mind to control population levels so that so many do not have to suffer socially/economically and yet still provide women with the right to choose?

    • theCL February 26, 2010 at 10:38 pm

      Color or economic status should have nothing to do with abortion. All people are equal. Period.

      What about the baby’s right to choose life?

      The myth of over-population is as old as humanity itself. It’ll never happen. So nobody gets to lord over anyone else deciding who gets to live or die. Hitler already tried that kind of evil. We killed him for it.

  • steve February 11, 2010 at 6:58 am

    the way these people think is chilling.

  • theCL February 11, 2010 at 12:42 am

    I’m gonna have nightmares after doing this post. Bizarre. Pure evil.

  • Matt February 11, 2010 at 12:12 am

    Excellent CL, very authoritative. That these “people” are still following though on their plans is a cancer on our nations. I hope that enough people wake up to stop it.