In light of the rapid expansion of government taking place these days, and considering the information about transnational-progressivism and a North American Union Community in our 3 previous posts, the following quotes certainly deserve serious consideration.
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist to question everything, especially the intentions of those in power. Believing in their purity however, takes a special kind of naivety. So "let no more be heard of confidence in man ..."
Senator Jesse Helms, Congressional Record, December 15, 1987, p. S 18146.
The influence of establishment insiders over our foreign policy has become a fact of life in our time … It is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our constitutional order.
A careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes, reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a new world order. Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberg Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles.
In the globalist point of view, nation-states and national boundaries do not count for anything. Political philosophies and political principles seem to become simply relative. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.
In this point of view, the activities of international financial and industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world design — with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as its centerpiece — into being.
Barry M. Goldwater, With No Apologies, pp. 284-85.
In my view the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power — political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical....
Freedom — spiritual, political, economic — is denied any importance in the Trilateral construction of the next century....
What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved.... As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future.
Frank Chodorov, "One Worldism," The Freeman, March 1955, p. 334.
Ten years ago the United Nations was ushered into the world as the guarantor of peace. It has failed. Despite that obvious fact, there are many whose faith in some sort of Superstate as an instrument of peace is unshaken, and who lay the failure of the UN to the limitations put upon it by the autonomy of its members. That is to say, they believe in peace through coercion; the more coercion, the more peace.
History cannot give this faith the slightest support. The grandeur that was Rome did not prevent the parts of that empire from coming into conflict with one another nor from rising up against the central authority. Even our American coalition of commonwealths came near breaking up in war, and uprisings have all but disintegrated the British Empire.
Jeanne Kirkpatrick, “American Power for what? A symposium,” Commentary, Jan. 2000.
[F]oreign governments and their leaders, and more than a few activists here at home, seek to constrain and control American power by means of elaborate multilateral processes, global arrangements, and UN treaties that limit both our capacity to govern ourselves and act abroad.
David Rockefeller, "From A China Traveler," New York Times, August 10, 1973.
Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose....
The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most
important and successful in human history.
Ronald Reagan, (I'll have to dig up the source again. I have it around here somewhere. It's in a book of letters he wrote.)
Your concern about the Trilateral Commission is shared by many – including me. I’ve enclosed a packet that gives some background as well as a few eyebrow-lifting remarks by a commission member. Naturally, it isn’t a research piece which digs deep down but it’s obvious that trilateralists believe there is an elite which should guide the affairs of men.
Previously: The Transnational-Progressive Plot, The Key Concepts of Transnational-Progressivism, and A North American Community.
